This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
  • 0 voto(i) - 0 media
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
aspirato 100 Cv litro
#51
alex zanardi Ha scritto:(cut). e prima del montaggio passerò all'interno del cilindro, una sorta di spazzola rotante che non ricordo come si chiama, ma serve a levigare le creste della lappatura, e lo scopo e quello di non usurare le fascie durante i primi giri del motore. ( devo solo eleminare la porosità, senza intaccare le rigature di fondo che trattengono il velo d'olio)


Dovrebbe essere il flex-Hone.. gran bel lavoro, lo seguirò con molto interesse... unica cosa che onestamente non "capisco/condivido" è il lavoro sulle luci di ingresso in camera di combusione, ovvero nella eliminazione della raccordatura centrale.
La maggiorparte dei lavori visti e anche quello che ho realizzato io, manteneva questo canale, e supponevo fosse di utilità per dividere correttamente l'iniezione di carburante nelle due valvole, seguendo peraltro il profilo del collettore originale.
Puoi chiarirmi meglio il tuo punto di vista?


Sla-ciao
Swap 1.8 vvt - Megasquirt 3 ms3x - 4-2-1 - wideband - reg. fuel pressure - air filter downpipe - decat - ecc.. lo sbronzina motori.
  Cita messaggio
#52
EnergyHide Ha scritto:Dovrebbe essere il flex-Hone.. gran bel lavoro, lo seguirò con molto interesse... unica cosa che onestamente non "capisco/condivido" è il lavoro sulle luci di ingresso in camera di combusione, ovvero nella eliminazione della raccordatura centrale.
La maggiorparte dei lavori visti e anche quello che ho realizzato io, manteneva questo canale, e supponevo fosse di utilità per dividere correttamente l'iniezione di carburante nelle due valvole, seguendo peraltro il profilo del collettore originale.
Puoi chiarirmi meglio il tuo punto di vista?


Sla-ciao


spero di aver capito bene la domanda ( se cosi non fosse ritieneti liberissimo di dire la tua), la parete che ostacolava il passaggio del comburente e che ho levigato, e quella parte lavorata, che vedi nella foto 7, gli ho asportato 1,5mm,
questo perchè come vedi dal disegno ( perdonatemi non ho mai imparato a disegnare bene) ho cercato di ridurre i flussi verso il centro delle valvole, abbassando il divisorio centrale e quindi aumentandone la conicità, la raggiatura sulla cresta non solo l'ho mantenuta ma aumentata, la cresta che era circa 1,5mm ora e 2,5mm. ( poco visibile ma in foto 1 ce)
questo per cercare di migliorare i flussi verso le 2 estremità opposte delle valvole, evitando cosi il problema che si rimescolino, in modo confuso, ho addirittura possano ostacolarsi a vicenda.
spero di essere riuscito a spiegare il lavoro ed il mio punto di vista, se vedi altre cose che ti sembrano poco redditizie, mi farebbe molto piacere conoscerle. e sempre utile conoscere anche solo l'idea di chi conosce queste cose.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14648[/ATTACH]


Allegati Anteprime
   
  Cita messaggio
#53
Pdor figlio di Kmer Ha scritto:wow! sono contento di sapere che a parte il peso spropositato del blocco in ghisa (la maggiore pecca a mio avviso), i componenti di questo motore siano realizzati così bene Smile


il monoblocco in ghisa, "pesante" è circa 30Kg, ora sapendo che l'alluminio ha un peso specifico che approssimiamo ad 1/3, ma una maggiore conducibilità termica, e una minore resistenza meccanica, ( vedi monoblocco Z4 2 diversi tipi di alluminio costampati, [sovrapposti] poi incamiciato) posso azzardare che avrebbe un peso di circa 12/15 Kg.
visto il maggior costo di produzione, e il maggior lavoro, si capisce il perchè sia destinato solo a vetture di fascia alta.

adesso una domanda; con la tua Mx hai problemi di sottorterzo? con un monoblocco più leggero aumenta.
per persone che non sono come il mio omonimo, potrebbe essere un vantaggio avere una zavorra nel cofano anteriore.
  Cita messaggio
#54
beh chiaro che resta solo un sogno il monoblocco alleggerito....costerebbe come un' s2000 XD e non avrebbe molto senso su un' auto così tranquilla, e che molto probabilmente nel circuito di raffreddamento dovrebbe andarci solo ad acqua avendo materiali diversi

riguardo al sottosterzo diciamo che ora mi stò capendo un pò di più e smuso meno...
la colpa principale oltre alle mia incapacità di frenare tardi e gestire gradualmente il peso, la dò agli ammo scarichi...
(ma per ora rimangono così a scopo educativo)
certo il sottosterzo aumenterebbe ancora con un anteriore più leggero, e pure con un autobloccante...

però non mi dispiacerebbe provare una miata con motore leggero (rotativo)
sec me (col pieno di benzina) diventerebbe una mezza via tra un' mx-5 e una elise Smile
Pure NA experience
se la volevo comoda, sicura, e che tenesse la strada, mi prendevo un treno....
"volete un' auto che vada veloce? beh, allora NON prendetevi un' mx-5 !" [Dafde] :)
"entravi in curva come se dovessi schivare una mucca!" [Bisso] XD
"co te parte nà porsche, l'è come che te parte nà casa" [cit]

sopra ai 14"..non è vero amore ;)
  Cita messaggio
#55
Costa Ha scritto:Ho letto tutto il post, veramente invidiabile e ammirevole il lavoro che stai facendo, soprattutto il come ci rendi partecipi Thumbup

Fortuna che il nostro motore nasceva Turbo quindi i componenti sono sovradimensionati per un aspirato : zip :

Carissimo toscanaccio sei un grandissimo B-------O ( senza offesa nel senso buono) avevo già il dubbio di aver lasciato troppo materiale sulle bielle, averle alleggerite poco,
e te mi hai fatto salire la scimmia di limarle ancora, nei prox giorni le porterò a vedere ad un amico preparatore, e se mi conferma che sono alleggeribili, accidenti a te devo rifare il lavoro,e i calcoli per il peso albero.:x e tutto per recuperare una manciata di mezzi Cv.

ma se la scimmia e giusta durante il rodaggio, vengo in toscana e ti offro una birra per ringraziarti.
Grazie ottimo suggerimento.
  Cita messaggio
#56
Calma, non è detto che bielle e pistoni siano esattamente quelli della vecchia versione turbo.
Lanfranco & Simona
RC 1.8 Wind Highland Green
NA 1.8 (codename: Kermit) British Racing Green
Team Ciocapiàt: Lanf-Denver (pilota)
  Cita messaggio
#57
Lanf Ha scritto:Calma, non è detto che bielle e pistoni siano esattamente quelli della vecchia versione turbo.

Anche perchè il motore della 323 turbo (GTR/GTX) non era il 1.8 BP?

The 1,839 cc or 1.8 BP is a DOHC (dual-overhead camshaft) variant of the B8, featuring a 83 mm bore and 85 mm stroke and four valves per cylinder. This engine was called 'BP-ZE by Mazda engineers' and featured a forged crankshaft, piston oil squirters, a structural aluminum oil pan with cooling fins, a 7,000 rpm redline, and Variable Intertia Charging System VICS which is activated by a control solenoid at high rpm to increase horsepower in the upper rev range. The engine in base form on 91RON fuel produces 96 kW at 6,000 rpm and 165 Nm at 4,000 rpm. The engine is a favourite for both N/A and turbo motoring enthusiasts for its robust design, materials and construction.
  Cita messaggio
#58
si l'ho immaginavo,
ed e per questo che le farò vedere ad un esperto che e 40 anni che prepara motori.
al massimo mi darà del barbone dicendomi che le bielle non si alleggeriscono, si cambiano.
  Cita messaggio
#59
Mi pare di aver letto da qualche parte, in qualche forum, che non dovrebbe essere molto dissimile dal B6T.
P.s. ma lasciale così che son belline e grassoccie :chessygrin:
Nicola
Gilda
http://www.mx5italia.com/showthread.php?...so-gli-ITB

"Altro che 22 scemi che rincorrono un pallone...lo sai i che ci metterei io in quel campo??? 22 ruspe pe fa una bella pista da crossee!!!
[Cit.telefonica con Karlitos parlando del calciatore della Fiorentina col SLS AMG :chessygrin:]
  Cita messaggio
#60
Riporto 3D di Vindi su Nutz
Mazda 4 cylinder Engine History and Interchangability Guide

By Randy Stocker

Like most auto manufacturers Mazda has a lot of commonality between engines. There are four basic types of 4 cylinder piston motors that Mazda currently produces for the US market. They are grouped into engine families, ‘B’, ‘F’, 'Z' and ‘G’. The Miata uses the ‘B’ family of motors.

The ‘B’ family starts with a 1.3 liter SOHC. It was primarily used oversees but did come to the USA for a short stint in the Ford Festiva (other markets got a DOHC 1.3). The primary example of the early ‘B’ motors in the USA came here in the GLC as a 1.5 liter SOHC, later upped to 1.6 liters for the 323 in the mid 80’s (78x83.6mm). The 1.6 liter version has as large a bore as the block can accommodate and cannot really have it's displacement increased much more, in fact, enlarging the bore beyond +1mm is not advised. A DOHC head was designed for the 1.6 liter for the 1988 323 GTX turbo. Because of the severe duty that motor could see many enhancements were made to it for reliability reasons. A stronger web stiffened block and oil spray cooled pistons were among the changes. See SSS Automotive site from Australia for B6T tidbits.

The 116 HP Miata 1.6 DOHC motor from 1990-1993 is a normally aspirated version of that 323 turbo engine. It mainly differs from the turbo counterpart in higher compression pistons (to 9.4:1), lighter connecting rods and a lighter flywheel. This means that the NA version of the motor is quite over engineered for its applications. (how many NA motors do you know have oil spray cooling for the pistons). The automatic transmission version of the 1.6 DOHC engine has lower compression pistons to 9.0:1 and the camshafts have less duration. These changes were done for the automatic version to gain torque at a lower rpm and minimize detonation from the torque eating trans. The tradeoff is a less peak HP rating of 100. In 1991 a running change was made to the crank design from repeated failures of the pulley keyway. The pre-91 motors had a 22mm crank snout while the late 1991 and later had 27mm crank snouts. The 1.6 DOHC motor lived on in the Mercury Capri and XR2 until 1995.

1.6 pistons (22 KB)1.6 pistons. oil squirters (12 KB)oil squirters

The pistons that were available for the 1.6 B6P were the 323 GTX 7.8:1 with a heavy dish (left), the Miata automatic 9.0:1 with a moderate dish (middle) and the Miata 5-speed 9.4:1 with a shallow 1mm dish (right)

The rods used in the 88-89 323GTX turbo are beefier. They have a thicker beam, thicker small end and larger size bolts. They weight approx 580 grams (w/bolts and nuts) vs the approx 540 grams of the Miata rod. The GTX rods are no longer available new from Mazda and the Miata pieces supercede it.

gtxrod.jpg (12 KB)

In 1994 the need to meet emissions standards and to confront cries for more power in the Miata was answered by using the 1.8 DOHC motor that has been in the Protege since 1990. It is also a ‘B’ family member but has a longer bore spacing to accommodate the larger 83mm pistons. The stroke was also increased to 85mm (both the 1.6 and 1.8 DOHC have the same 221.5mm block deck height and 134mm head height). The 1.8 is the same design and is just as robust as the 1.6. It has the same rods, same oil-cooled pistons, same oil passages, same head design, same HLA's and same crank design. Unlike the 1.6, the auto trans version of the 1.8 was not changed at all.

Since the 1.8 is really just a stretched 1.6, most everything on the front and back of the motor will interchange between the them. This includes the cam angle sensor, coolant intake pipes, flywheel/clutch assembly, various covers and brackets, cam gears, water pump, and timing belt tensioner, etc. The intake manifold, exhaust manifold, motor mount brackets and camshafts do not interchange because of the bore spacing differences. The 1.8 ‘B’ motor has also seen duty in the 1991-1995 Ford Escort GT/LXE, 1990-99 Mazda Protege, 1991-95 Mercury Tracer LTS and Kia Sephia GS. (FYI, the 90-93 Escort GT and Tracer LTS 1.8 DOHC use the same throttlebody and flowmeter as the 1.6 Miata).

A SOHC BP 1.8 was used in the Protege from 92-94 and the short block is identical to the DOHC. The SOHC pistons when used in a DOHC motor produce about 8.2:1 CR. The lower half of the SOHC two piece intake manifold also makes a great foundation for a custom IRTB for the 90-97 BP DOHC heads.

BPSOHCpiston02.jpg (37 KB) Dished BP SOHC piston.

The head of the 1.8 ‘B’ was slightly revised with the stretch job by using larger sized intake and exhaust ports, larger valves, moving the cam angle sensor from the intake to the exhaust cam, and using a 4mm higher lift cam with shorter valve stem lengths and a larger base circle. OEM cams specs. For 1995 the valve springs were revised slightly stiffer. This allowed the thick seat shim (1+mm) that was used on the 94 1.8 motor to boost the installed spring pressure to be removed and was replaced by just a thin metal shim (about .005") to protect the head seat.

95 valve springs. 95valvspringcompare.jpg (26KB)95 valve springs (left) are stiffer compared to 99+.

Starting with the 3/95 start of the ODB-II implementation (VIN 14193) the pistons were changed with a slight dome to increase the compression ratio to an actual 9.0:1. The '94-3/95 pistons were factory rated at 9.0:1 but actually was around 8.8.

94-96pistoncompare(23KB)94 vs 96 piston

The Japanese/Austr market version of the Protege got a turbo version of the 1.8, the 'BPT' equipped GTR and GTX. The very rare GTR recieved, amoung other things, a special web stiffened block cast 'BPII', a special cast '26' head with a flow vane in the intake port and sodium filled exhaust valves!.

In 1996 the peak HP rating of the Miata 1.8 motor was raised to 133 hp from 128. This comes primarily from the new for 1996 ODBII software having the ability to lean out the above 6000 rpm fuel curve. The slightly raised dome 9.0 pistons also continued.

The 1999-00 Miata uses basically the same 1.8 ‘B’ as the 1994-1997 but it was again revised. The 'BP-4W' engine uses a block with higher compression pistons to 9.5:1 from 9.0:1. The head had the most enhancements, the intake ports were raised from 39 degrees to 51 degrees to create a straighter flow path (the exhaust ports did not change), the hall effect cam angle sensor (CAS) was removed from the back of the head and replaced with a magnetic sensor and toothed wheel on the front of the crankshaft (a second magnetic sensor was added to the intake cam gear pulley to verify timing), and solid lifter camshafts with advanced timing, more duration and lots more intake lift were introduced.

Mk1 vs Mk2 head cutaway compare (23KB)Cutaway comparison of Mk1 and Mk2 1.8 head.

The stock 99-00 cams are actually quite strong from the factory. They will easily support higher hp levels with more lift adn duration than the 90-97 HLA cam. Mazda also makes an intake cam specifc to the home Japanese market. It has the same specs as the USA cam but the cam timing is advance a few degrees. If is part number BP5A12420.

Japanese spec cam. cam5A.jpg (23KB)Japanese spec cam identifed by "5A" cast into billet.

The 99-00 head will interchange onto the earlier 1.8 block if you also determine how to control the variable intake valve in the '99 manifold (VICS systems, probable a rpm activated selenoid will do it) as well as retrofit a cam angle sensor for the earlier ECU (the cam drive is still there so it just slaps on). You will also need a 99+ intake manifold.

To install 99-00 cams in an earlier head you just have to transfer the solid lifters. The early retainers, locks and springs can be used as-is. The lifters fit them fine. You just can't mix the locks and the retainers since the locks are different size. i.e. the 99+ locks must be used with the 99+ retainers and the 94-97 locks must be used with the 94-97 retainers. The only hard part is setting the lash. Using the 99+ cams in a M1 head requires using shims that are .020-.030" thicker since the cam basecircle and valve stem are slightly different. You will have to install the cams, measure the cold lash, and then order the required size shims. From the factory they come in 2.75mm - 3.75mm thickness about every .002 - .003" (~.05-.06mm)

springretainercompare.jpg (31 KB) Spring retainer/lock compare 99+ left, HLA style right.

99head4W.jpg (54 KB) 99+ head uses blockoff plate for cam angle sensor. 99-00 identified by '4W' cast on head and cams.

99EXcamangledrive.jpg (47 KB) Interestingly though, the 99-00 EX cam retains cam angle drive.

99intakeports.jpg (32 KB) 99 intake ports are much higher and angle downward Intakeports90-97-18BP.jpg (56 KB) 90-97 1.8 'B' intake ports.

99intakeportmismatch.jpg (33 KB) 99+ intake port mismatch with 90-97 gasket.99intakeManifold.jpg (54 KB) 99-00 VICS intake manifold

liftercomptop.jpg (33 KB) Liftercompbottom.jpg (32 KB) 99+ uses solid lifters (left) with adjustment disk while 90-97 uses HLA's (right).

intakecamscomp.jpg (42 KB) 99 solid lifter intake cam vs 90-97 hydrallic, visible difference in profile. Mazda reverted back to the solid billet design from the 1.6 instead of the hollow design of the 90-97 1.8.

99camcovercutout.jpg (26 KB) 99-00 uses a second timing sensor in the intake cam sprocket in addition to the crank sensor.

99piston.jpg (47 KB) 99-00 pistons produce 9.5:1 compression through a raised dome in the middle.

For 2001 Mazda introduced another variant of the 1.8 ‘B’ with 'VVT' variable valve timing and higher compression 10:1 pistons. It was advertised as having 155 hp but in reality only had 142 hp because of US emissions tuning. VVT is a hydralically adjusted intake cam for advance, retard and overlap and uses the oil pressure and a ECU controlled valve for adjustment.

The 2001 'BP-Z3' engine also had a new intake manifold without VICS but with a similar torque enhancing set of partial butterflys that increases velocity. One of the unique improvements for 2001 was the addition of a Main Bearing Support Plate (MBSP). Even though the 'B' engine uses 5 mail bearings the crankshaft can still flex quite a bit at higher revs and output levels. Mazda added a MBSP by tying the main caps together bolting it to a thicker stamping if the windage tray.

The 2001 'BP-Z3' engine's head can be retrofitted to ealier 1.8 blocks but you're on your own on how to control the cam selenoid. The MBSP can be installed on all prior 1.8 Miata blocks as long as the 2001 oil pan is used too - all year main caps come cast and machined with the bosses (it was actually OEM on the rare early GTR motor).

2001VVT.jpg (49 KB) VVT 2001pistoncompre.jpg (53 KB) 2001 10:1 piston 01intake2001.jpg (53 KB) 2001 intake manifold 2001MBSP.jpg (34 KB) 2001 MBSP

The 'Z' engines are a new family which is an evoltion of the 'B' engine. The head is entirely different with round ports and narrow valve angles but the shortblock is nearly the same as the B6.

Z5Engine.jpg (34 KB) Z5 engine

I get a lot of questions about Miata interchangabilty with the 626/MX6 and B series truck motors because of the larger 2.0 liter displacement. Here's the scoop as I know it.

The ‘F’ motors (F,FE,F2, FS) are larger in both bore spacing and deck height than the ‘B’s are are mostly unrelated. Little to nothing will interchanges between the 'B' and 'F' motors, even the bellhousing bolt pattern is different from the 'B' motors.

The 'F'/'MA' engines were first used in the late 70’s in the 2.0 liter RWD 626 and B2000/Ford Courier. An enhanced version called the FE was introduced in the 1984 2.0 liter (86x86mm) FWD 626 and the B2000 pickup. The stroke was increased in 1988 for the 2.2 F2 motor as used in the B2200 and MX6/626/Ford Probe. None of the Mazda 4 cylinder heads are an interferance fit with the exception of the long stroke 2.2. All the F, FE and F2 motors had SOHC heads with the exception of the 1998+ 2.0 liter Kia Sportage which uses the block from the 1984-87 B2000/MX6 (86x86) mated with a new, very 'B' like, DOHC head. This engine was also in use in the Japanese only market 4wd 626 and European/Austrailan market 626 16V too.

626AWDDOHCFE3motor.jpg (57 KB) 2.0 DOHC 'FE3' motor in European market 1990 626 16V

In 1993 Mazda created a short bore spacing version of the F engine called the ‘FS’. It was used in the 1993+ 626/MX6 (83x92mm) and had a DOHC head. Although it is loosly based on the 'FE/F2' internals it is a new generation and not many parts interchange. The motor mount bosses are in different locations and the bellhousing bolt pattern is different. Same situation as the generation change between the 'F'/'MA' and the 'FE'.

The ‘G’ motors are the 2.6 liter truck motors. All are SOHC. There have been two 2.6's, the 1987/88 was a Mitsubishi built engine and from 1989-93 was a Mazda designed and built motor. It was also used in the MPV.

The common use of the engine types makes for some interesting and easy to do swaps, such as a 1.8 DOHC Escort GT motor in a Ford Festiva, 2.0 DOHC Kia Sportage Head on a 2.2 626/Probe/B2200, and a 2.0 DOHC 'FS' MX6 engine in a 1999 Protege. Hmmmm...

Mazda 4 cylinder engines
Motor Years Bore Stroke CC Models
1.3 B 1988-1993(USA) 71 83.6 1324 Ford Festiva. Japanese market got DOHC head option.
1.5 E/B5 SOHC ? 77 80 1490 GLC
1.6 SOHC B6 ? 78 83.6 1597 323, 90-92 Protege, MX-3
1.6 DOHC B6P 1988-1995 78 83.6 1597 323 GTX, Miata, Mercury Capri/XR2, MX-3
1.8 SOHC B8 1990-1992 83 85 1839 Protege
1.8 DOHC BP 1990-2001 83 85 1839 90-98 Protege, 91-96 Ford Escort GT, 94-01 Miata, Mercury Tracer LTS, 94-97 Kia Sephia GS
2.0 F/MA 1978-82 80 98 1970 RWD 626, B2000, Courier
2.0 FE 1984-87 86 86 1998 FWD 626/MX6, B2000
2.0 FE3 DOHC 1998+ 86 86 1998 Kia Sportage
2.2 F2 1987-199? 86 94 2184 B2200, FWD 626/MX6, Ford Probe
2.0 DOHC FS * 1993+ 83 92 1991 FWD 626/MX6, 1999+ Protege, Protege5
1.8 DOHC FP 1999+ 83 85 1839 1999 Protege
1.5 ZL DOHC 1999+ 78 78.4 1498 1999+ Japanese market Protege. Has VVT
1.5 Z5 DOHC 1995-98 75.3 83.6 1489 1999 Protege
1.6 Z6/M DOHC 1999+ 78 83.6 1597 1999+ Protege

Much of the credit for the 'F' engine information goes to Mazda Master Technician Alan Johnson of Rosen Mazda in Gurney, IL. Thanks Alan!

* Note. The Japanese market recieved a 170 hp varient of the FS called the FS-ZE. It had performance oriented intake cam, intake manifold and ECU tuning combined with higher 10.5:1 compression ration pistons.

UPDATE 9/21/98 As reported in the August 1998 issue of the MCA magazine, Mazdaspeed makes a 3mm stroker crank for the 1.8 'B' motor. This crank is used in the Japanese only market 2.0 liter C-Spec Miata (85x88). It is part number 9E3A-11-300 and costs $2,258.66 USD. It is basically a forged racing prepped unit and that is why it costs so much. It is available for import from Mazda Competition at 800-435-2508.

Also, Toda Racing in Japan offers a race prepped forged stroker crank for the 1.6 'B' engine as well. According to their web page (http://www.todaracing.com), it offers a total of 1854cc. It currently sells for 300,000 Yen which is $2112 @142 Yen/USD.

UPDATE 9/21/2000

(Q)What Mazda engines besides the 12a and 13b rotary can be swapped into the Miata?

(A)

Mazda makes 5 'boinger' [piston] engine families. They are:
# 'J' 90 degree v6 (as in the 3.0L 929 and MPV)
# 'K' 60 degree V6 (1.8 MX3, 2.0, 2.3 Millenia, 93+ 2.5 MX6/Probe)
# 'B' 4 cylinder (323, Protege, Miata)
# 'F' 4 cylinder (B2000/B2200, 78-92 F/FE/F2/F2T 626/MX6, 93+ FS 626/MX6)
# 'G' 4 cylinder (B2600, MPV) The DOHC 'J' is generally too wide for the Miata engine bay. Mazdaspeed M2 had done a swap of this engine back in 92 as an engineering exercise and is the only one known to exist. The SOHC fits but why, it's only 165 hp and not really matched to the Miata.

The 'K' engines are not designed for RWD and not only do the manifolds and plumbing not line up correctly for RWD but it will have oil starvation problems if used as such. MCA tried a swap of it back in 93 but was stillborn. The Susuki variant of the engine as used in the Vitara has real possibilities though! This swap has been talked about at length in the Miatapower list list and 'ask Bob' at Miata.net.

The 'F' engines are the 'big blocks' of the 4 cylinders. They are long stroke motors and are generally not designed for high revs. All were cast iron SOHC with the exception of the FS and FE3. The FE3 has been used here in the states in the Kia Sportage and has real possibilities for a Miata swap. I'm going to be installing a 2.3 version in a Miata this winter. I have written about it in the Miatapower list.

Any swap would require a tranny swap (or integrated bellhousing swap) too since none of the other engine families use the same bellhousing bolt pattern. I am using the B2200 truck tranny (w/Miata gears and a Miata PPF tailshaft housing) for my swap.
Nicola
Gilda
http://www.mx5italia.com/showthread.php?...so-gli-ITB

"Altro che 22 scemi che rincorrono un pallone...lo sai i che ci metterei io in quel campo??? 22 ruspe pe fa una bella pista da crossee!!!
[Cit.telefonica con Karlitos parlando del calciatore della Fiorentina col SLS AMG :chessygrin:]
  Cita messaggio


Discussioni simili
Discussione Autore Risposte Letto Ultimo messaggio
  [NC] 2.5 aspirato da 200 whp Flex 142 66,341 13-04-2018, 00:23
Ultimo messaggio: bonzo76
  2.0 aspirato da 200 bhp sopwith 294 72,444 13-07-2016, 00:38
Ultimo messaggio: tranqui83
  2.0 aspirato da 225 bhp Flex 29 12,678 30-08-2015, 00:38
Ultimo messaggio: Pee Tee
  1.6 aspirato da 100 ciucci x litro di adelscott Vitruvio74 8 4,528 23-06-2015, 19:41
Ultimo messaggio: Vitruvio74
  aspirato da millemila equini giuino 162 42,296 12-05-2015, 10:12
Ultimo messaggio: SymonDark
  Voglia di coppia da un Aspirato (Attenzione!!! No turbo!) yuza 254 35,395 21-02-2013, 01:18
Ultimo messaggio: JJ-GoatBoy



Utenti che stanno guardando questa discussione: 2 Ospite(i)